> A survey of tools used or considered for [[Collective knowledge management]], with each tool's verdict pulled from its own applied-evaluation Path note. ## [[Is Obsidian a good fit for collective knowledge management?|Obsidian]] ![[Obsidian#^definition]] ![[Is Obsidian a good fit for collective knowledge management?#^verdict]] ![[Is Obsidian a good fit for collective knowledge management?#^answer]] For the applied evaluation - positioning, per-axis fit, and the cluster-by-cluster mapping - see [[Is Obsidian a good fit for collective knowledge management?]]. ## [[Is Notion a good fit for collective knowledge management?|Notion]] ![[Notion#^definition]] ![[Is Notion a good fit for collective knowledge management?#^verdict]] ![[Is Notion a good fit for collective knowledge management?#^answer]] For the applied evaluation - positioning, per-axis fit, and the cluster-by-cluster mapping - see [[Is Notion a good fit for collective knowledge management?]]. ## [[Is Graphify a good fit for collective knowledge management?|Graphify]] ![[Graphify#^definition]] ![[Is Graphify a good fit for collective knowledge management?#^verdict]] ![[Is Graphify a good fit for collective knowledge management?#^answer]] For the applied evaluation - positioning, per-axis fit against [[Collective knowledge management]], and the pain-to-axis mapping - see [[Is Graphify a good fit for collective knowledge management?]]. ## Tools worth adding later As the radar matures, candidates with no current vault note that may be worth surveying include Confluence, MediaWiki, Roam, Logseq, Tana, AnyType, and custom git-backed wikis. Each would get its own primitive or evaluable note first, then a section here.